Mali vs Syria: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Mali
42.8
in 2019
Syria
42.58
in 2019
Mali rank
157th
Syria rank
158th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Mali
  • Syria
010203040201520172019

How they compare

Mali currently reports 42.8 against 42.58 in Syria, a difference of 0.22.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Syria ahead.

Mali ranks 157th and Syria ranks 158th of 188 countries.

Syria has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Mali or Syria?
Mali, at 42.8 against 42.58 in Syria as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Mali and Syria?
0.22, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Syria?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Mali and Syria rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Mali ranks 157th and Syria ranks 158th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.