Maldives vs Palau: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Maldives
52.47
in 2019
Palau
52.21
in 2019
Maldives rank
125th
Palau rank
126th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Maldives
- Palau
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 52.47 against 52.21 in Palau, a difference of 0.26.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Maldives has been ahead every year.
Maldives ranks 125th and Palau ranks 126th of 191 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Maldives or Palau?
- Maldives, at 52.47 against 52.21 in Palau as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Maldives and Palau?
- 0.26, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Palau?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Maldives and Palau rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Maldives ranks 125th and Palau ranks 126th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.