Malaysia vs United Kingdom: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Malaysia
68.23
in 2019
United Kingdom
68.69
in 2019
Malaysia rank
35th
United Kingdom rank
34th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Malaysia
- United Kingdom
How they compare
United Kingdom currently reports 68.69 against 68.23 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.46.
Across all 5 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 35th and United Kingdom ranks 34th of 191 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Malaysia or United Kingdom?
- United Kingdom, at 68.69 against 68.23 in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Malaysia and United Kingdom?
- 0.46, with United Kingdom ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and United Kingdom?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and United Kingdom rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Malaysia ranks 35th and United Kingdom ranks 34th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.