Malaysia vs Thailand: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Malaysia
68.23
in 2019
Thailand
67.91
in 2019
Malaysia rank
35th
Thailand rank
37th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Malaysia
- Thailand
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 68.23 against 67.91 in Thailand, a difference of 0.32.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 35th and Thailand ranks 37th of 188 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Malaysia or Thailand?
- Malaysia, at 68.23 against 67.91 in Thailand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Malaysia and Thailand?
- 0.32, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Thailand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Thailand rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Malaysia ranks 35th and Thailand ranks 37th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.