Malaysia vs Rwanda: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Malaysia
68.23
in 2019
Rwanda
69.11
in 2019
Malaysia rank
35th
Rwanda rank
32nd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Malaysia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 69.11 against 68.23 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.88.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 35th and Rwanda ranks 32nd of 191 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Malaysia or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 69.11 against 68.23 in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Malaysia and Rwanda?
- 0.88, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Rwanda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Rwanda rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Malaysia ranks 35th and Rwanda ranks 32nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.