Malawi vs Philippines: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Malawi
47.4
in 2019
Philippines
45.96
in 2019
Malawi rank
147th
Philippines rank
150th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Malawi
  • Philippines
01020304050201520172019

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 47.4 against 45.96 in Philippines, a difference of 1.44.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Malawi ahead.

Malawi ranks 147th and Philippines ranks 150th of 188 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Malawi or Philippines?
Malawi, at 47.4 against 45.96 in Philippines as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Malawi and Philippines?
1.44, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Philippines?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Malawi and Philippines rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Malawi ranks 147th and Philippines ranks 150th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.