Malawi vs Nepal: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Malawi
47.4
in 2019
Nepal
45.99
in 2019
Malawi rank
147th
Nepal rank
149th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Malawi
  • Nepal
01020304050201520172019

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 47.4 against 45.99 in Nepal, a difference of 1.41.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 147th and Nepal ranks 149th of 188 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Malawi or Nepal?
Malawi, at 47.4 against 45.99 in Nepal as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Malawi and Nepal?
1.41, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Nepal?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Malawi and Nepal rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Malawi ranks 147th and Nepal ranks 149th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.