Madagascar vs Vanuatu: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Madagascar
50.04
in 2019
Vanuatu
49.27
in 2019
Madagascar rank
135th
Vanuatu rank
137th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Madagascar
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 50.04 against 49.27 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.77.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Vanuatu ahead.
Madagascar ranks 135th and Vanuatu ranks 137th of 188 countries.
Vanuatu has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Madagascar or Vanuatu?
- Madagascar, at 50.04 against 49.27 in Vanuatu as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Madagascar and Vanuatu?
- 0.77, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Vanuatu?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Madagascar and Vanuatu rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Madagascar ranks 135th and Vanuatu ranks 137th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.