Luxembourg vs Mauritius: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Luxembourg
73.32
in 2019
Mauritius
72.22
in 2019
Luxembourg rank
19th
Mauritius rank
21st
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Luxembourg
- Mauritius
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 73.32 against 72.22 in Mauritius, a difference of 1.1.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 19th and Mauritius ranks 21st of 188 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Luxembourg or Mauritius?
- Luxembourg, at 73.32 against 72.22 in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Luxembourg and Mauritius?
- 1.1, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Mauritius?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Luxembourg and Mauritius rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Luxembourg ranks 19th and Mauritius ranks 21st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.