Libya vs Sudan: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Libya
48.41
in 2019
Sudan
47.84
in 2019
Libya rank
143rd
Sudan rank
146th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Libya
  • Sudan
01020304050201520172019

How they compare

Libya currently reports 48.41 against 47.84 in Sudan, a difference of 0.57.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.

Libya ranks 143rd and Sudan ranks 146th of 188 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Libya or Sudan?
Libya, at 48.41 against 47.84 in Sudan as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Libya and Sudan?
0.57, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Sudan?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Libya and Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Libya ranks 143rd and Sudan ranks 146th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.