Lebanon vs Zambia: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Lebanon
50.77
in 2019
Zambia
50.82
in 2019
Lebanon rank
132nd
Zambia rank
131st
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Lebanon
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 50.82 against 50.77 in Lebanon, a difference of 0.05.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Lebanon ranks 132nd and Zambia ranks 131st of 191 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Lebanon or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 50.82 against 50.77 in Lebanon as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Lebanon and Zambia?
- 0.05, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Zambia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Lebanon and Zambia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Lebanon ranks 132nd and Zambia ranks 131st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.