Lebanon vs Seychelles: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Lebanon
50.77
in 2019
Seychelles
51.25
in 2019
Lebanon rank
130th
Seychelles rank
127th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Lebanon
- Seychelles
How they compare
Seychelles currently reports 51.25 against 50.77 in Lebanon, a difference of 0.48.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 130th and Seychelles ranks 127th of 188 countries.
Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Lebanon or Seychelles?
- Seychelles, at 51.25 against 50.77 in Lebanon as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Lebanon and Seychelles?
- 0.48, with Seychelles ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Seychelles?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Lebanon and Seychelles rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Lebanon ranks 130th and Seychelles ranks 127th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.