Latvia vs Luxembourg: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Latvia
73.51
in 2019
Luxembourg
73.32
in 2019
Latvia rank
16th
Luxembourg rank
19th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Latvia
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 73.51 against 73.32 in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.19.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Latvia ranks 16th and Luxembourg ranks 19th of 188 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Latvia or Luxembourg?
- Latvia, at 73.51 against 73.32 in Luxembourg as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Latvia and Luxembourg?
- 0.19, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Luxembourg?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and Luxembourg rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Latvia ranks 16th and Luxembourg ranks 19th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.