Kyrgyzstan vs Lebanon: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Kyrgyzstan
50.42
in 2019
Lebanon
50.77
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
133rd
Lebanon rank
130th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 50.77 against 50.42 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.35.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Lebanon ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 133rd and Lebanon ranks 130th of 188 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Kyrgyzstan or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 50.77 against 50.42 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Kyrgyzstan and Lebanon?
- 0.35, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Lebanon?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Lebanon rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 133rd and Lebanon ranks 130th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.