South Korea vs Norway: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
South Korea
84.15
in 2019
Norway
81.27
in 2019
South Korea rank
2nd
Norway rank
3rd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- South Korea
- Norway
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 84.15 against 81.27 in Norway, a difference of 2.88.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 2nd and Norway ranks 3rd of 188 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, South Korea or Norway?
- South Korea, at 84.15 against 81.27 in Norway as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between South Korea and Norway?
- 2.88, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Norway?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do South Korea and Norway rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- South Korea ranks 2nd and Norway ranks 3rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.