South Korea vs Kosovo: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
South Korea
84.15
in 2019
Kosovo
64.73
in 2019
South Korea rank
2nd
Kosovo rank
1st
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- South Korea
- Kosovo
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 84.15 against 64.73 in Kosovo, a difference of 19.42.
That makes South Korea's figure about 1.3 times Kosovo's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 2nd and Kosovo ranks 1st of 188 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, South Korea or Kosovo?
- South Korea, at 84.15 against 64.73 in Kosovo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between South Korea and Kosovo?
- 19.42, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Kosovo?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do South Korea and Kosovo rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- South Korea ranks 2nd and Kosovo ranks 1st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.