Kiribati vs Palestine: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Kiribati
53.39
in 2019
Palestine
52.51
in 2019
Kiribati rank
121st
Palestine rank
123rd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Kiribati
- Palestine
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 53.39 against 52.51 in Palestine, a difference of 0.88.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 121st and Palestine ranks 123rd of 190 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Kiribati or Palestine?
- Kiribati, at 53.39 against 52.51 in Palestine as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Kiribati and Palestine?
- 0.88, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Palestine?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and Palestine rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Kiribati ranks 121st and Palestine ranks 123rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.