Kazakhstan vs Norway: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Kazakhstan
81.25
in 2019
Norway
81.27
in 2019
Kazakhstan rank
4th
Norway rank
3rd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Kazakhstan
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 81.27 against 81.25 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.02.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 4th and Norway ranks 3rd of 188 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Kazakhstan or Norway?
- Norway, at 81.27 against 81.25 in Kazakhstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Kazakhstan and Norway?
- 0.02, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Norway?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Kazakhstan and Norway rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Kazakhstan ranks 4th and Norway ranks 3rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.