Kazakhstan vs Kosovo: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Kazakhstan
81.25
in 2019
Kosovo
64.73
in 2019
Kazakhstan rank
4th
Kosovo rank
1st
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Kazakhstan
- Kosovo
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 81.25 against 64.73 in Kosovo, a difference of 16.52.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.3 times Kosovo's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 4th and Kosovo ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Kazakhstan or Kosovo?
- Kazakhstan, at 81.25 against 64.73 in Kosovo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Kazakhstan and Kosovo?
- 16.52, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kosovo?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Kazakhstan and Kosovo rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Kazakhstan ranks 4th and Kosovo ranks 1st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.