Jordan vs Slovenia: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Jordan
55.56
in 2019
Slovenia
54.82
in 2019
Jordan rank
111th
Slovenia rank
113th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Jordan
- Slovenia
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 55.56 against 54.82 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.74.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Slovenia ahead.
Jordan ranks 111th and Slovenia ranks 113th of 191 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Jordan or Slovenia?
- Jordan, at 55.56 against 54.82 in Slovenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Jordan and Slovenia?
- 0.74, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Slovenia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Jordan and Slovenia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Jordan ranks 111th and Slovenia ranks 113th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.