Japan vs North Macedonia: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Japan
65.26
in 2019
North Macedonia
66.01
in 2019
Japan rank
50th
North Macedonia rank
47th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Japan
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 66.01 against 65.26 in Japan, a difference of 0.75.
Across all 5 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 50th and North Macedonia ranks 47th of 188 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Japan or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 66.01 against 65.26 in Japan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Japan and North Macedonia?
- 0.75, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and North Macedonia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Japan and North Macedonia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Japan ranks 50th and North Macedonia ranks 47th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.