Japan vs Mauritania: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Japan
65.26
in 2019
Mauritania
65.99
in 2019
Japan rank
50th
Mauritania rank
48th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Japan
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 65.99 against 65.26 in Japan, a difference of 0.73.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 50th and Mauritania ranks 48th of 188 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Japan or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 65.99 against 65.26 in Japan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Japan and Mauritania?
- 0.73, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Mauritania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Japan and Mauritania rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Japan ranks 50th and Mauritania ranks 48th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.