Jamaica vs Kiribati: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Jamaica
53.73
in 2019
Kiribati
53.39
in 2019
Jamaica rank
120th
Kiribati rank
122nd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Jamaica
- Kiribati
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 53.73 against 53.39 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.34.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Kiribati ahead.
Jamaica ranks 120th and Kiribati ranks 122nd of 191 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Jamaica or Kiribati?
- Jamaica, at 53.73 against 53.39 in Kiribati as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Jamaica and Kiribati?
- 0.34, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Kiribati?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Jamaica and Kiribati rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Jamaica ranks 120th and Kiribati ranks 122nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.