Italy vs Palestine, State of: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Italy
53.11
in 2019
Palestine, State of
52.51
in 2019
Italy rank
122nd
Palestine, State of rank
123rd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Italy
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Italy currently reports 53.11 against 52.51 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.6.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.
Italy ranks 122nd and Palestine, State of ranks 123rd of 190 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Italy or Palestine, State of?
- Italy, at 53.11 against 52.51 in Palestine, State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Italy and Palestine, State of?
- 0.6, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Palestine, State of?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Italy and Palestine, State of rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Italy ranks 122nd and Palestine, State of ranks 123rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.