Italy vs Jamaica: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Italy
53.11
in 2019
Jamaica
53.73
in 2019
Italy rank
121st
Jamaica rank
118th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Italy
- Jamaica
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 53.73 against 53.11 in Italy, a difference of 0.62.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 121st and Jamaica ranks 118th of 188 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Italy or Jamaica?
- Jamaica, at 53.73 against 53.11 in Italy as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Italy and Jamaica?
- 0.62, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Jamaica?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Italy and Jamaica rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Italy ranks 121st and Jamaica ranks 118th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.