Israel vs Samoa: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Israel
58.86
in 2019
Samoa
58.59
in 2019
Israel rank
84th
Samoa rank
85th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Israel
- Samoa
How they compare
Israel currently reports 58.86 against 58.59 in Samoa, a difference of 0.27.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Samoa ahead.
Israel ranks 84th and Samoa ranks 85th of 188 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Israel or Samoa?
- Israel, at 58.86 against 58.59 in Samoa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Israel and Samoa?
- 0.27, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Samoa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Israel and Samoa rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Israel ranks 84th and Samoa ranks 85th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.