Israel vs Peru: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Israel
58.86
in 2019
Peru
59.07
in 2019
Israel rank
84th
Peru rank
82nd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Israel
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 59.07 against 58.86 in Israel, a difference of 0.21.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 84th and Peru ranks 82nd of 188 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Israel or Peru?
- Peru, at 59.07 against 58.86 in Israel as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Israel and Peru?
- 0.21, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Peru?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Israel and Peru rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Israel ranks 84th and Peru ranks 82nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.