Iraq vs Sudan: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Iraq
48.02
in 2019
Sudan
47.84
in 2019
Iraq rank
148th
Sudan rank
149th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Iraq
- Sudan
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 48.02 against 47.84 in Sudan, a difference of 0.18.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Iraq has been ahead every year.
Iraq ranks 148th and Sudan ranks 149th of 191 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Iraq or Sudan?
- Iraq, at 48.02 against 47.84 in Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Iraq and Sudan?
- 0.18, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Iraq and Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Iraq ranks 148th and Sudan ranks 149th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.