Iran vs Tunisia: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Iran
58.21
in 2019
Tunisia
58.41
in 2019
Iran rank
89th
Tunisia rank
87th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Iran
  • Tunisia
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 58.41 against 58.21 in Iran, a difference of 0.2.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.

Iran ranks 89th and Tunisia ranks 87th of 188 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Iran or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 58.41 against 58.21 in Iran as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Iran and Tunisia?
0.2, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Tunisia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Iran and Tunisia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Iran ranks 89th and Tunisia ranks 87th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.