Indonesia vs Vanuatu: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Indonesia
49.09
in 2019
Vanuatu
49.27
in 2019
Indonesia rank
138th
Vanuatu rank
137th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Indonesia
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Vanuatu currently reports 49.27 against 49.09 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.18.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Vanuatu has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 138th and Vanuatu ranks 137th of 188 countries.
Vanuatu has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Indonesia or Vanuatu?
- Vanuatu, at 49.27 against 49.09 in Indonesia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Indonesia and Vanuatu?
- 0.18, with Vanuatu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Vanuatu?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Indonesia and Vanuatu rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Indonesia ranks 138th and Vanuatu ranks 137th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.