Indonesia vs Madagascar: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Indonesia
49.09
in 2019
Madagascar
50.04
in 2019
Indonesia rank
138th
Madagascar rank
135th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Indonesia
  • Madagascar
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 50.04 against 49.09 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.95.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Madagascar ahead.

Indonesia ranks 138th and Madagascar ranks 135th of 188 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Indonesia or Madagascar?
Madagascar, at 50.04 against 49.09 in Indonesia as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Indonesia and Madagascar?
0.95, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Madagascar?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Indonesia and Madagascar rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Indonesia ranks 138th and Madagascar ranks 135th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.