Iceland vs Malaysia: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Iceland
69.1
in 2019
Malaysia
68.23
in 2019
Iceland rank
33rd
Malaysia rank
35th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Iceland
- Malaysia
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 69.1 against 68.23 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.87.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 33rd and Malaysia ranks 35th of 188 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Iceland or Malaysia?
- Iceland, at 69.1 against 68.23 in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Iceland and Malaysia?
- 0.87, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Malaysia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Iceland and Malaysia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Iceland ranks 33rd and Malaysia ranks 35th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.