Hungary vs New Zealand: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Hungary
70.98
in 2019
New Zealand
71.48
in 2019
Hungary rank
26th
New Zealand rank
24th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Hungary
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 71.48 against 70.98 in Hungary, a difference of 0.5.
Across all 5 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 26th and New Zealand ranks 24th of 188 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Hungary or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 71.48 against 70.98 in Hungary as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Hungary and New Zealand?
- 0.5, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and New Zealand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Hungary and New Zealand rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Hungary ranks 26th and New Zealand ranks 24th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.