Hong Kong vs Iceland: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Hong Kong
69.13
in 2019
Iceland
69.1
in 2019
Hong Kong rank
31st
Iceland rank
33rd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Hong Kong
- Iceland
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 69.13 against 69.1 in Iceland, a difference of 0.03.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 31st and Iceland ranks 33rd of 188 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Hong Kong or Iceland?
- Hong Kong, at 69.13 against 69.1 in Iceland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Hong Kong and Iceland?
- 0.03, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Iceland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong and Iceland rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Hong Kong ranks 31st and Iceland ranks 33rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.