Guyana vs Iran: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Guyana
57.87
in 2019
Iran
58.21
in 2019
Guyana rank
91st
Iran rank
89th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Guyana
- Iran
How they compare
Iran currently reports 58.21 against 57.87 in Guyana, a difference of 0.34.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 91st and Iran ranks 89th of 188 countries.
Iran has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Guyana or Iran?
- Iran, at 58.21 against 57.87 in Guyana as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Guyana and Iran?
- 0.34, with Iran ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Iran?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Guyana and Iran rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Guyana ranks 91st and Iran ranks 89th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.