Guinea-Bissau vs Trinidad and Tobago: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 38.61 against 35.62 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 2.99.
That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 169th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 172nd of 188 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Guinea-Bissau or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 38.61 against 35.62 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Guinea-Bissau and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 2.99, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 169th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 172nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.