Guinea-Bissau vs Mozambique: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Guinea-Bissau
38.61
in 2019
Mozambique
39.78
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau rank
172nd
Mozambique rank
169th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 39.78 against 38.61 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 1.17.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 172nd and Mozambique ranks 169th of 191 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Guinea-Bissau or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 39.78 against 38.61 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Guinea-Bissau and Mozambique?
- 1.17, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Mozambique?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Mozambique rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 172nd and Mozambique ranks 169th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.