Georgia vs Taiwan: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Georgia
75.04
in 2019
Taiwan
75.11
in 2019
Georgia rank
12th
Taiwan rank
11th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Georgia
- Taiwan
How they compare
Taiwan currently reports 75.11 against 75.04 in Georgia, a difference of 0.07.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 12th and Taiwan ranks 11th of 191 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Georgia or Taiwan?
- Taiwan, at 75.11 against 75.04 in Georgia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Georgia and Taiwan?
- 0.07, with Taiwan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Taiwan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Georgia and Taiwan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Georgia ranks 12th and Taiwan ranks 11th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.