France vs United States: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

France
73.47
in 2019
United States
73.44
in 2019
France rank
17th
United States rank
18th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • France
  • United States
020406080201520172019

How they compare

France currently reports 73.47 against 73.44 in United States, a difference of 0.03.

Across all 5 years both countries report, France has been ahead every year.

France ranks 17th and United States ranks 18th of 188 countries.

France has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, France or United States?
France, at 73.47 against 73.44 in United States as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between France and United States?
0.03, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and United States?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do France and United States rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
France ranks 17th and United States ranks 18th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.