Finland vs Mexico: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Finland
66.4
in 2019
Mexico
67.01
in 2019
Finland rank
45th
Mexico rank
43rd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Finland
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 67.01 against 66.4 in Finland, a difference of 0.61.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 45th and Mexico ranks 43rd of 188 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Finland or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 67.01 against 66.4 in Finland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Finland and Mexico?
- 0.61, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Mexico?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Finland and Mexico rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Finland ranks 45th and Mexico ranks 43rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.