Finland vs Mauritania: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Finland
66.4
in 2019
Mauritania
65.99
in 2019
Finland rank
45th
Mauritania rank
48th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Finland
- Mauritania
How they compare
Finland currently reports 66.4 against 65.99 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.41.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 45th and Mauritania ranks 48th of 188 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Finland or Mauritania?
- Finland, at 66.4 against 65.99 in Mauritania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Finland and Mauritania?
- 0.41, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Mauritania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Finland and Mauritania rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Finland ranks 45th and Mauritania ranks 48th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.