Fiji vs Uruguay: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Fiji
57.05
in 2019
Uruguay
56.29
in 2019
Fiji rank
100th
Uruguay rank
103rd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Fiji
- Uruguay
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 57.05 against 56.29 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.76.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Fiji has been ahead every year.
Fiji ranks 100th and Uruguay ranks 103rd of 188 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Fiji or Uruguay?
- Fiji, at 57.05 against 56.29 in Uruguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Fiji and Uruguay?
- 0.76, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Uruguay?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Fiji and Uruguay rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Fiji ranks 100th and Uruguay ranks 103rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.