Fiji vs South Africa: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Fiji
57.05
in 2019
South Africa
56.88
in 2019
Fiji rank
100th
South Africa rank
101st

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Fiji
  • South Africa
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Fiji currently reports 57.05 against 56.88 in South Africa, a difference of 0.17.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Fiji has been ahead every year.

Fiji ranks 100th and South Africa ranks 101st of 188 countries.

Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Fiji or South Africa?
Fiji, at 57.05 against 56.88 in South Africa as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Fiji and South Africa?
0.17, with Fiji ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and South Africa?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Fiji and South Africa rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Fiji ranks 100th and South Africa ranks 101st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.