Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Eswatini
36.72
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau
38.61
in 2019
Eswatini rank
170th
Guinea-Bissau rank
169th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Eswatini
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 38.61 against 36.72 in Eswatini, a difference of 1.89.
That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 170th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 169th of 188 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Eswatini or Guinea-Bissau?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 38.61 against 36.72 in Eswatini as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
- 1.89, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Eswatini ranks 170th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 169th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.