Estonia vs United Arab Emirates: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Estonia
76.06
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
75.88
in 2019
Estonia rank
8th
United Arab Emirates rank
9th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Estonia
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 76.06 against 75.88 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.18.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 8th and United Arab Emirates ranks 9th of 188 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Estonia or United Arab Emirates?
- Estonia, at 76.06 against 75.88 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Estonia and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.18, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and United Arab Emirates?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Estonia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Estonia ranks 8th and United Arab Emirates ranks 9th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.