Equatorial Guinea vs Uruguay: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Equatorial Guinea
56.17
in 2019
Uruguay
56.29
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
104th
Uruguay rank
103rd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 56.29 against 56.17 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.12.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 104th and Uruguay ranks 103rd of 188 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 56.29 against 56.17 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Uruguay?
- 0.12, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Uruguay?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Uruguay rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 104th and Uruguay ranks 103rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.