Equatorial Guinea vs Sierra Leone: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Equatorial Guinea
56.17
in 2019
Sierra Leone
55.92
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
104th
Sierra Leone rank
107th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 56.17 against 55.92 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.25.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 104th and Sierra Leone ranks 107th of 188 countries.
Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Sierra Leone?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 56.17 against 55.92 in Sierra Leone as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Sierra Leone?
- 0.25, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sierra Leone?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Sierra Leone rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 104th and Sierra Leone ranks 107th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.