Equatorial Guinea vs Marshall Islands: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Equatorial Guinea
56.17
in 2019
Marshall Islands
55.93
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
106th
Marshall Islands rank
107th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 56.17 against 55.93 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.24.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 106th and Marshall Islands ranks 107th of 191 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Marshall Islands?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 56.17 against 55.93 in Marshall Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Marshall Islands?
- 0.24, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Marshall Islands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Marshall Islands rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 106th and Marshall Islands ranks 107th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.