Equatorial Guinea vs Eritrea: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Equatorial Guinea
56.17
in 2019
Eritrea
55.93
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
104th
Eritrea rank
106th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Eritrea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 56.17 against 55.93 in Eritrea, a difference of 0.24.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Eritrea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 104th and Eritrea ranks 106th of 188 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Eritrea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 56.17 against 55.93 in Eritrea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea?
- 0.24, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 104th and Eritrea ranks 106th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.