El Salvador vs Palestine, State of: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
El Salvador
51.85
in 2019
Palestine, State of
52.51
in 2019
El Salvador rank
127th
Palestine, State of rank
124th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- El Salvador
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Palestine, State of currently reports 52.51 against 51.85 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.66.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 127th and Palestine, State of ranks 124th of 191 countries.
Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, El Salvador or Palestine, State of?
- Palestine, State of, at 52.51 against 51.85 in El Salvador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between El Salvador and Palestine, State of?
- 0.66, with Palestine, State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Palestine, State of?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do El Salvador and Palestine, State of rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- El Salvador ranks 127th and Palestine, State of ranks 124th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.